Solid State Science and Technology, Vol. 19, No 1 (2011) 88-100

ISSN 0128-7389

88

OPTIMIZED CONDITIONS FOR SYNTHESIS OF Na-A ZEOLITE FROM

COAL FLY ASH BY APPLYING THE RESPONSE SURFACE

METHODOLOGY

Abdul Salam Matlob1,*, Rose Aini Kamarudin1, Zaemah Jubri1 and Zainab Ramli2

1Department of Engineering Sciences & Mathematic, College of Engineering,

Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Km 7 Jalan Kajang-Puchong,

43009 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia

2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science,

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 80990 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia

*Corresponding Author: abdulsalam@uniten.edu.my

 

ABSTRACT

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used in this study to determine the

optimum conditions for the synthesis of Na-A zeolites from coal fly ash (CFA).

Application of this methodology allows a better understanding of the influence of

various factors (Si/Al ratio (0.5-1.5), incubation temperature (70-120 °C) and time of

incubation (2–4 days)) on the synthesis of zeolites. The Box–Behnken design was

applied with different levels of the factors, determining its influence on yield percent in

order to obtain contour plots. The silicates and aluminates were extracted from coal fly

ash (CFA) with 4M NaOH solution assisted by microwave irradiation (power level 100

watts) for 6 minutes followed by incubation at various temperatures. The products

isolated were characterized by their XRD images and found to be Na-A zeolites,

sodalite octahydrate and gibbsite. The highest percent yield of product was obtained at

0.5 SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio, 70 °C incubation temperature for 3 days, the product

however, was not a zeolite. It was gibbsite which contains Al(OH)3. Na-A zeolite was

formed at SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio 1-1.5, incubation temperature was 70 – 95 °C and 2-4

days of incubation and the highest yield was observed at SiO2\Al2O3 ratio = 1,

incubation temperature 70 oC for 4 days. The contour plots showed that the yield

percent of the product was inversely proportional to the three factors used. The order of

effectiveness of the factors on yield percent is: SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio > incubation

temperature > duration of incubation.

 

http://journal.masshp.net/wp-content/uploads/Journal/2011/Jilid%201/Abdul%20Salam%20Matlob%2088-100.pdf

 

REFERENCES

[1] T. Henmi, New Ceramics, 7 (1997) 54-62

[2] H. L. Chang and W-H. Shih, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39 (2000) 4185-4191

[3] N. Shigemoto, S. Sugiyama, H. Hayashi and K. Miyaura, J. Mater. Sci., 30

(1995) 5777-5783

[4] H. L. Chang and W-H. Shih, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37 (1998) 71-78

[5] Meier W.M. and Olson D.H., “Atlas of Zeolite Structure Types” 3rd Edition,

(Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 1992)

[6] T. Yanagisawa, T. Shimizu, K. Kuroda and C. Kato, Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan, 63

(1990) 988

[7] S. Inagaki, Y. Fukushima and K.J. Kuroda, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun, 8

(1993) 680-682

[8] S. Inagaki, A. Koiwai, N. Suzuki, Y. Fukushima and K. Kuroda, Bull.Chem.

Soc. Japan, 69 (1996) 1449-1457

[9] Kunihiro Fukui, Manabu Katoh, Tetsuya Yamamoto and Hideto Yoshida, Adv.

Powder Technol., 20 (1) (2009) 35-40

[10] Hidekazu Tanaka, Atsushi Fujii, Satoshi Fujimoto and Yoshiki Tanaka Adv.

Powder Technol., 19 (1) (2008) 83-94

[11] Kunihiro Fukui, Keiji Kanayama, Tetsuya Yamamoto and Hideto Yoshida, Adv.

Powder Technol., 18 (4) (2007) 381-393

[12] M. Inada, H. Tsujimoto, Y. Eguchi. N. Enomoto and J. Hojo, Fuel, 84 (12–13)

(2005) 1482-1486

[13] Kunihiro Fukui, Kazuhiro Arai, Keiji Kanayama and Hideto Yoshida, Adv.

Powder Technol., 17 (4) (2006) 369-382

[14] A.P. Bayuseno, W.W. Schmahl, Th. Müllejans, Journal of Hazardous

Materials, 167 (1-3) (2009) 250-259

[15] Deyi Wu, Bohua Zhang, Li Yan, Hainan Kong and Xinze Wang, International

Journal of Mineral Processing, 80 (2-4) (2006) 266-272

[16] Y.M. Park, T.Y. Yang, S.Y. Yoon, R. Stevens and H.C. Park Materials Science

and Engineering: A, 454-455 (2007) 518-522

[17] Marisa Nascimento, Paulo Sérgio Moreira Soares and Vicente Paulo de Souza,

Fuel 88 (9) (2009) 1714-1719

[18] Han Zhou, Yanshuo Li, Guangqi Zhu, Jie Liu and Weishen Yang, Separation

and Purification Technology, 65 (2) (2009) 164-172

[19] Yajing Wu, Xiaoqian Ren and Jun Wang, Micropor. and Mesopor. Materials,

116 (1-3) (2008) 386-393

[20] H. Youssef, D. Ibrahim and S. Komarneni, Micropor. and Mesopor. Materials,

115 (3) (2008) 527-534

[21] Rewadee Anuwattana, Kenneth J. Balkus Jr., Suwimol Asavapisit and Pojanie

Khummongkol, Micropor. and Mesopor. Materials, 111 (1-3) (2008) 260-266

[22] S. Ferreira-Dias, A.C. Correia, F.O. Baptista and M.M.R. da Fonseca, J. Mol.

Catal. B: Enzym. 11 (2001) 699–711

[23] G. Øye, J. Sjöblom and M. Stöcker, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 34 (2000) 291–

299

[24] J. Guervenou, P. Giamarchi, C. Coulouarn, M. Guerda, C. le Lez and T. Oboyet,

Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 63 (2002) 81–89

[25] O.A. Anunziata, A.R. Beltramone and J. Cussa, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 270 (2004)

77–85

[26] G. Du, Y. Yang, W. Qiu, S. Lim, L. Pfefferle and G.L. Haller, Appl. Catal. A:

Gen. 313 (2006) 1–13

[27] D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed., (Wiley, New

York, 1997)

[28] Y. Gao, X. Ju, W. Qiu and H. Jiang, Food Control, 18 (2007) 1250–1257

[29] Marisa Nascimento, Paulo Sérgio Moreira Soares and Vicente Paulo de Souza,

Fuel, 88 (9) (2009) 1714-1719